After visiting an OCNAC branch, Perry learned that his estranged wife had initiated several unauthorized transactions from his accounts. Perry subsequently moved to a new address and stopped receiving quarterly account statements. In July 2014, Perry opened two accounts with OCNAC. We write solely for the parties’ benefit, so our summary of the facts is brief. Because Perry has failed to allege that OCNAC breached a contractual provision, obligation, or duty, we will affirm.
On appeal, Perry only pursues the breach of contract claim against OCNAC. The District Court dismissed Perry’s second amended complaint in full. He filed a lawsuit bringing claims for negligence, breach of contract, and statutory violations. (“OCNAC”), and a government agency that regulates such entities, the National Credit Union Administration (“NCUA,” collectively with OCNAC, the “defendants”). Perry sought to recover the lost funds from the credit union, OCNAC #1 Federal C.U. Joe Perry alleges that his estranged wife initiated a series of unauthorized withdrawals totaling $65,000 from his accounts at a federal credit union. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.
#Download joe more and more full#
34.1(a) Novem_ Before: CHAGARES, BIBAS, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: November 19, 2021) _ OPINION* _ * This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. Hillman _ Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 1:19-cv-00167) District Judge: Honorable Noel L. NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION, and/or its agents OCNAC #1 FEDERAL C.U., and/or its agents JOHN DOE 1-99 _ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No.
0 kommentar(er)
